In the world of philosophy, Socrates is a name that needs no introduction. His teachings and ideas have influenced countless generations and continue to do so to this day. But what about the people who surrounded him?
Who were they and what role did they play in his life? One such person was a man named Crito. A long-time friend and follower of Socrates, Crito played a pivotal role in one of the philosopher’s most famous dialogues.
In this article, we’ll take a closer look at who Crito was and his relationship with Socrates. Join us as we delve into the life of one of history’s most fascinating figures and the people who shaped it.
Who Was Crito To Socrates
Crito was an ancient Athenian who was a close friend of Socrates. He was deeply devoted to the philosopher and was distraught at the prospect of his impending execution. Crito, along with some of Socrates’ other friends, pooled together their resources to arrange an escape for their friend and mentor.
In Plato’s dialogue, “Crito,” the two men are depicted in Socrates’ prison cell, where he awaits execution. Crito presents arguments to persuade Socrates to escape, but Socrates ultimately convinces him that it would be better not to attempt an escape.
Crito’s loyalty to Socrates is evident throughout the dialogue, and his willingness to make almost any sacrifice to save his friend’s life is a testament to their close relationship.
While Crito is not known for his philosophical contributions, he played an important role in Socrates’ life and legacy. His unwavering support and devotion to the philosopher demonstrate the impact that Socrates had on those around him.
Introduction To Crito And His Relationship With Socrates
Crito was a close friend and devoted follower of Socrates, an ancient Athenian philosopher. He is best known for his role in Plato’s dialogue, “Crito,” where he visits Socrates in prison and attempts to persuade him to escape before his execution.
Crito’s relationship with Socrates is characterized by his loyalty and devotion to the philosopher. He is willing to go to great lengths to save his friend’s life, even if it means breaking the law or risking his own safety.
Despite his lack of philosophical contributions, Crito’s relationship with Socrates is significant because it sheds light on the impact that Socrates had on those around him. Crito’s unwavering support for Socrates demonstrates the profound effect that the philosopher had on his followers, and the enduring legacy of his teachings.
Crito’s Background And Early Life
Little is known about Crito’s background and early life, but he was a wealthy Athenian who was from the deme of Alopece, just like Socrates. He was likely a member of the aristocracy and would have been well-educated.
Crito’s wealth and status in Athenian society are evident in his attempts to secure Socrates’ release from prison. He vouched to pay Socrates’ bail and was even willing to pledge to the court that Socrates would not flee.
While Crito is portrayed as a conventional Athenian who could not understand Socrates’ philosophy, his actions demonstrate that he deeply respected and cared for his friend. He was present at both Socrates’ trial and execution, and his devotion to the philosopher never wavered.
Meeting Socrates And Becoming His Follower
Crito’s relationship with Socrates began when he became a follower of the philosopher’s teachings. Like many Athenians, Crito was drawn to Socrates’ unique approach to philosophy, which emphasized independent reason and judgment over traditional beliefs and customs.
As Crito became more involved in Socrates’ circle, he developed a deep admiration and respect for the philosopher. He was particularly impressed by Socrates’ commitment to living a virtuous life, even in the face of adversity and persecution.
When Socrates was accused of corrupting the youth and sentenced to death, Crito was devastated. He could not bear the thought of losing his friend and mentor. Along with other followers of Socrates, Crito sought to save his life by arranging an escape from prison.
Although their plan ultimately failed, Crito’s devotion to Socrates never wavered. He continued to honor the philosopher’s memory and teachings long after his death, serving as a testament to the profound impact that Socrates had on those around him.
Crito’s Role In Socrates’ Trial And Execution
Crito’s role in Socrates’ trial and execution was significant. He was one of the few people who visited Socrates in prison and tried to persuade him to escape. Crito believed that it was unjust for Socrates to be executed, and he was willing to do whatever it took to save his friend’s life.
In the dialogue, Crito presents several arguments to persuade Socrates to escape. He argues that Socrates’ death would reflect badly on his friends, and that they should not worry about the financial cost or risk involved in helping him escape. Crito also argues that it would be unjust for Socrates to remain in prison, as he would be aiding his enemies in wronging him unjustly.
However, Socrates disagrees with Crito’s arguments and instead presents the voice of the Laws of Athens, which explain why it would be unjust for him to leave his cell. Despite Crito’s efforts, Socrates ultimately convinces him that it would be better not to attempt an escape.
Crito’s role in Socrates’ trial and execution highlights the importance of loyalty and friendship in ancient Athens. His devotion to Socrates demonstrates the close relationships that existed between philosophers and their followers. In addition, Crito’s arguments also reveal the complex ethical and philosophical issues surrounding justice, duty, and social contract theory that were central to ancient Greek thought.
Crito’s Philosophical Views And Contributions
Although Crito is not known for his philosophical contributions, his arguments in the dialogue shed light on his views on justice and the relationship between the individual and the state. Crito argues that it is unjust for Socrates to remain in prison and face execution, and that he should escape to avoid such an unjust fate.
However, Socrates counters with the argument that it would be unjust to break the laws of Athens, even if they had been unjustly applied in his case. This argument introduces the concept of the social contract theory of government – the idea that individuals have a moral obligation to obey the laws of their society, even if they disagree with them.
Crito’s arguments also raise questions about the nature of justice and whether it can be achieved through injustice. He argues that it would be just for Socrates to escape and avoid an unjust punishment, but Socrates counters that such an action would be unjust and would harm the laws of Athens, which are just.
