How Does Descartes Argue That Material Things Exist In Meditation 6?

Have you ever wondered how we can be sure that the physical world around us actually exists?

Renowned philosopher Descartes tackled this question in his Sixth Meditation, where he explores the existence of material things and the distinction between mind and body.

Through a series of arguments based on perception, imagination, and pure understanding, Descartes presents a unique perspective on substance dualism and the relationship between the mind and body.

In this article, we will delve into Descartes’ thought process and explore how he argues for the existence of material things in Meditation 6.

So sit back, relax, and let’s dive into the world of Descartes’ philosophy.

How Does Descartes Argue That Material Things Exist Meditation 6

Descartes begins his argument by acknowledging the strong possibility that material objects exist, as they are the subject-matter of pure mathematics, which he perceives clearly and distinctly.

He then presents two arguments for the existence of material things: one based on the faculty of imagination and the other based on the senses.

Descartes distinguishes between imagination and pure understanding, noting that while he can perceive all sorts of properties of a triangle using his understanding alone, it becomes much more difficult to imagine a thousand-sided figure.

He concludes that the imagination must rely on something other than the mind for its existence, conjecturing that it is connected with the body and allows the mind to picture corporeal objects.

While this is not a definitive proof of the existence of material things, it is a strong conjecture.

Descartes then turns to reflect on what he perceives by means of the senses. He notes that he has a body that exists in a world and can experience pleasure, pain, emotion, hunger, and more.

He argues that these perceptions must come from an outside source, as they are so much more vivid than the perceptions he consciously creates in his own mind.

If they come from without, it is only natural to suppose that the source of these sensory ideas in some way resembles the ideas themselves.

From this point of view, Descartes concludes that all knowledge comes from without via the senses, providing further evidence for the existence of material things.

Introduction To Descartes And The Sixth Meditation

The French philosopher René Descartes is widely considered to be the founder of modern Western philosophy. In his Sixth Meditation, entitled “The existence of material things, and the real distinction between mind and body,” Descartes sets out to prove the existence of material things.

Descartes begins his argument by acknowledging the strong possibility that material objects exist, as they are the subject-matter of pure mathematics, which he perceives clearly and distinctly. He then presents two arguments for the existence of material things: one based on the faculty of imagination and the other based on the senses.

Through these arguments, Descartes distinguishes between imagination and pure understanding, notes that the imagination must rely on something other than the mind for its existence, and conjectures that it is connected with the body and allows the mind to picture corporeal objects.

He then reflects on what he perceives by means of the senses and argues that these perceptions must come from an outside source, providing further evidence for the existence of material things.

The Problem Of Skepticism

Despite Descartes’ arguments for the existence of material things, his philosophy is plagued by the problem of skepticism. Descartes himself acknowledges that there is always a possibility that he is being deceived by an evil demon or some other malicious entity.

This doubt is especially problematic for Descartes’ argument based on sensory perception, as it raises the question of whether our senses can be trusted to accurately reflect the external world.

Furthermore, Descartes’ reliance on God as a guarantor of truth and certainty has been criticized as circular reasoning, as it assumes the very thing it seeks to prove – the existence of God.

In light of these challenges, some philosophers have argued that Descartes’ method of doubt ultimately fails to provide a solid foundation for knowledge and that skepticism cannot be fully overcome.

Descartes’ Argument From Perception

Descartes’ argument from perception is based on the idea that our sensory experiences provide evidence for the existence of material things. He argues that our sensory perceptions are so vivid and involuntary that they must come from an outside source, and that this source must resemble the ideas themselves.

Descartes notes that he can perceive his body and the physical world through his senses, and that these perceptions include qualities such as extension, shape, movement, hardness, heat, color, smell, and taste. He argues that it would be odd to suggest that he can involuntarily create perceptions so much more vivid than the ones he creates voluntarily.

Therefore, Descartes concludes that these sensory perceptions must come from an outside source, and that this source is likely to be material things themselves. This argument provides further evidence for the existence of material things, as it suggests that our sensory experiences are caused by physical objects in the world around us.

The Role Of Imagination In Descartes’ Philosophy

In Descartes’ philosophy, imagination plays a crucial role in understanding the existence of material things. He distinguishes between imagination and pure understanding, noting that while the latter deals only in mathematical relations, the former allows the mind to picture corporeal objects.

Descartes conjectures that the imagination is connected with the body, suggesting that it relies on something other than the mind for its existence. He argues that this is a strong indication of the existence of material things, as it suggests that the imagination is able to picture corporeal objects because they actually exist.

Furthermore, Descartes notes that while the imagination can be a useful tool for understanding certain concepts, it has its limitations. For example, it becomes much more difficult to imagine complex shapes such as a thousand-sided figure.

This limitation of the imagination further supports Descartes’ argument for the existence of material things, as it suggests that there are limits to what the mind can create on its own. The fact that there are certain things that cannot be imagined without relying on something external to the mind provides evidence for the existence of material things.

Pure Understanding And Substance Dualism

Descartes’ famous cogito ergo sum, or “I think therefore I am,” identifies thinking as the essence of every thing that thinks. He believes that there is an incorporeal substance that exists solely by performing the act of thinking, and that is all that the mind can know.

In the sixth meditation, Descartes distinguishes material objects from mind and stresses that he has a clear and distinct idea of himself as simply a thinking, non-extended thing (res cogitans, non extensa), and on the other hand, he has a distinct idea of body as simply an extended, non-thinking thing (res extensa, non cogitans).

This talk of thinking thing vs. extended thing suggests a clear dualism of mind and body. They are mutually exclusive substances that appear to make up the world.

However, some critics argue that Descartes is either siding with Platonists who hold that the soul is the only constituent of a human being and uses the body as a tool or offering a traditional abstraction as geometers do who abstract figures from complex reality.

In response to this criticism, Descartes admits that this interpretation is possible but insists that the real distinction of mind from body is the result of attentive meditation.

The Mind-Body Relationship

In addition to arguing for the existence of material things, Descartes also explores the relationship between the mind and the body in Meditation 6.

He begins by asserting that he can clearly and distinctly understand the mind and body separately from one another, implying that each can exist alone without the other.

Descartes then distinguishes between understanding and imagination, noting that while understanding deals only in mathematical relations, imagination allows the mind to turn outward toward the body and picture corporeal objects.

He conjectures that imagination is connected with the body, suggesting a dependence between the two.

Furthermore, Descartes reflects on what he perceives by means of the senses, arguing that these perceptions must come from an outside source and resemble the ideas themselves.

This suggests a further dependence between the mind and body, as sensory ideas are received through the body and processed by the mind.

Overall, Descartes’ argument for the existence of material things and exploration of the mind-body relationship provide insight into his philosophy on the nature of reality and knowledge.

About The Author