What Is Spectacle According To Aristotle? A Comprehensive Explanation

When it comes to understanding the art of tragedy, Aristotle is a name that often comes up.

His work, Poetics, is a cornerstone of literary theory and has influenced countless writers and thinkers throughout history.

In Poetics, Aristotle breaks down the components of tragedy into six key elements, one of which is spectacle.

But what exactly does he mean by spectacle? And how does it fit into the larger picture of tragedy?

In this article, we’ll explore Aristotle’s thoughts on spectacle and its role in the world of theatre.

So sit back, relax, and let’s dive into the world of ancient Greek drama.

What Is Spectacle According To Aristotle

According to Aristotle, spectacle is one of the six key components of tragedy. It refers to the visual aspects of a play, including the costumes, scenery, and other elements that contribute to the overall visual experience.

However, Aristotle believed that spectacle was the least important element of tragedy. He argued that the power of tragedy comes from the plot and the characters, not from the visual effects.

In fact, Aristotle believed that catharsis, or emotional release, should come from the inner structure of the play rather than from spectacle. He argued that a well-constructed plot should be able to evoke emotions like fear and pity even without the aid of visual effects.

Aristotle also believed that the art of spectacle belonged more to the set designer than to the poet. While spectacle can be a source of pleasure in tragedy, it is not essential to its artistic value.

Introduction To Aristotle’s Poetics And The Six Elements Of Tragedy

Aristotle’s Poetics is a treatise on the art of poetry and drama, written in the 4th century BC. In this work, Aristotle outlines the six elements of tragedy, which he believed were essential for creating a successful play. These elements are plot, character, thought, diction, music, and spectacle.

Plot is the most important element of tragedy, according to Aristotle. It refers to the sequence of events that make up the story of the play. The plot should be structured in a way that creates a sense of tension and conflict, leading to a moment of catharsis or emotional release for the audience.

Character is also crucial in tragedy. Characters should be well-developed and have distinct personalities and motivations. The speeches assigned to them by the dramatist should reveal their moral qualities.

Thought refers to the ideas and themes explored in the play. These can be expressed through dialogue or through maxims and proverbs.

Diction refers to the language used in the play. It should be metrical and convey the representation effectively.

Music is an embellishment of language, and is usually conveyed through song accompanied by rhythmical movement.

Finally, spectacle refers to the visual aspects of the play, including costumes, scenery, and other elements that contribute to the overall visual experience. While spectacle can be enjoyable for audiences, Aristotle believed that it was not essential to the artistic value of a play.

The Importance Of Spectacle In Tragedy

Despite Aristotle’s belief that spectacle is the least important element of tragedy, it still plays a significant role in the overall experience of the audience. Spectacle has the ability to bring about catharsis, although Aristotle claims that catharsis from spectacle is less artistic than catharsis produced directly by the events of the plot.

Furthermore, spectacle can be used as a tool to convey certain themes or messages in a play. For example, the use of dark lighting and eerie sound effects can create a sense of foreboding and horror, contributing to the overall mood of a tragedy.

However, Aristotle emphasizes that the power of tragedy should not rely solely on spectacle. A well-crafted plot and compelling characters are essential to creating a truly impactful and meaningful tragedy. Spectacle should be used as a complementary element rather than a crutch for the artistic value of a play.

Criticisms Of Aristotle’s Emphasis On Spectacle

Despite Aristotle’s belief that spectacle is the least important element of tragedy, some critics argue that spectacle can play a crucial role in enhancing the emotional impact of a play. They argue that visual effects can create a more immersive experience for the audience, allowing them to better connect with the characters and the story.

Furthermore, some argue that Aristotle’s view of spectacle as a secondary aspect of tragedy is limited by his focus on Greek theater. In modern theater, visual effects are often used in innovative and powerful ways that can significantly contribute to the overall impact of a play.

Additionally, some critics argue that Aristotle’s emphasis on plot and character at the expense of spectacle overlooks the fact that all elements of a play are interconnected and contribute to its artistic value. A well-designed set or costume can enhance the audience’s understanding of the characters and their motivations, making it an important part of the overall theatrical experience.

Spectacle In Modern Theatre: How Aristotle’s Ideas Have Influenced Contemporary Performances

Despite Aristotle’s belief that spectacle was not the most important element of tragedy, his ideas have had a significant impact on modern theatre. Contemporary performances often use elaborate sets, costumes, and special effects to create a visually stunning experience for the audience.

However, many modern theatre practitioners still adhere to Aristotle’s belief that spectacle should not overshadow the plot and characters. They strive to create a balance between visual elements and the inner structure of the play to achieve a powerful emotional impact on the audience.

Furthermore, Aristotle’s concept of catharsis has influenced modern theatre in the way that directors and performers approach their craft. They aim to evoke emotions in the audience through the story and characters rather than relying solely on visual effects.

Overall, Aristotle’s ideas about spectacle in theatre have influenced contemporary performances by emphasizing the importance of balancing visual elements with plot and character development. His concept of catharsis has also influenced modern theatre practitioners in their approach to evoking emotions in the audience.

About The Author